Repository | Zeitschrift | Band | Artikel
In defense of non-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony
pp. 3227-3237
Abstrakt
Almost everyone agrees that many testimonial beliefs constitute knowledge. According to non-reductionists, some testimonial beliefs possess positive epistemic status independent of that conferred by perception, memory, and induction. Recently, Jennifer Lackey has provided a counterexample to a popular version of this view. Here I argue that her counterexample fails.
Publication details
Published in:
(2014) Synthese 191 (14).
Seiten: 3227-3237
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0443-0
Referenz:
Perrine Timothy (2014) „In defense of non-reductionism in the epistemology of testimony“. Synthese 191 (14), 3227–3237.