Repository | Series | Buch
An epistemic foundation for scientific realism
defending realism without inference to the best explanation
Abstrakt
This monograph develops a new way of justifying the claims made by science about phenomenon not directly observable by humans, such as atoms and black holes. It details a way of making inferences to the existence and properties of unobservable entities and states of affairs that can be given a probabilistic justification. The inferences used to establish realist claims are not a form of, and neither do they rely on, inference to the best explanation. The final chapters apply the developed conceptual apparatus to key cases from the history of science and from recent science. One example concerns realism with respect to atoms. Another looks at inferences from recent astronomical data to conclusions about the size and shape of those parts of the universe lying beyond that which we can observe.
Details | Inhaltsverzeichnis
realism and reason
pp.1-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1_1inductive skepticism
pp.7-36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1_2atoms and molecules
pp.167-190
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1_7the size and shape of the universe
pp.191-215
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1_8Publication details
Publisher: Springer
Ort: Dordrecht
Year: 2018
Seiten: 220
Series: Synthese Library
Series volume: 402
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02218-1
ISBN (hardback): 978-3-030-02217-4
ISBN (digital): 978-3-030-02218-1
Referenz:
Wright John (2018) An epistemic foundation for scientific realism: defending realism without inference to the best explanation. Dordrecht, Springer.