Repository | Buch | Kapitel
Modernity, postmodernism and international relations
pp. 127-147
Abstrakt
There is a certain irony in discussing postmodernism and the social sciences in relation to the study of international relations. This results from the subject matter of international relations and the manner in which it is approached. As Philip Windsor has noted, international relations "literally considers the fate of the world". As such, "it is bound to be comprehensive by virtue of its preoccupation, but it can not be unitary because of its preoccupation" (Windsor, 1987: 187). It has a unifying concern, but no unifying methodology or philosophy. The result is a subject area which it is difficult at times to hold together. In consequence, international relations is by nature a fragmented "discipline". This fragmentation is unavoidable. However, it is not necessarily a weakness and may even be seen as desirable.
Publication details
Published in:
Doherty Joe, Graham Elspeth, Malek Mo (1992) Postmodernism and the social sciences. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
Seiten: 127-147
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-22183-7_8
Referenz:
Rengger Nick, Hoffman Mark (1992) „Modernity, postmodernism and international relations“, In: J. Doherty, E. Graham & M. Malek (eds.), Postmodernism and the social sciences, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 127–147.