Max Scheler
Gesellschaft

Repository | Buch | Kapitel

206042

Whose line is it anyway?

late Foucault and Pynchon

Paul Martin Eve

pp. 101-124

Abstrakt

Continuing on from the preceding chapter, it is fair to say that Foucault's trajectory of thought on the Enlightenment is one that oscillates, best demonstrated at this juncture by a problematic 1978 interview first published in 1980 (281). Perhaps as a consequence of the flux in his thought at this point, Foucault essentially reverts here to a straightforward repetition of the Weberian-inflected, early Frankfurt School mantra: "[c]ouldn't it be concluded that the Enlightenment's promise of attaining freedom through the exercise of reason has been turned upside down, resulting in domination by reason itself, which increasingly usurps the place of freedom?"1 Clearly, this view has a strong resonance with Foucault's earliest, unproblematised stance on the Enlightenment, but it is now entwined within a fluctuating field of geographically and temporally specific complications.

Publication details

Published in:

Eve Paul Martin (2014) Pynchon and philosophy: Wittgenstein, Foucault and Adorno. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Seiten: 101-124

DOI: 10.1057/9781137405500_5

Referenz:

Eve Paul Martin (2014) Whose line is it anyway?: late Foucault and Pynchon, In: Pynchon and philosophy, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 101–124.