Repository | Series | Buch | Kapitel
The physician as moral arbiter
pp. 23-31
Abstrakt
When asked to comment about the physician as moral arbiter, I thought it useful to begin by considering just what a moral arbiter would be. To speak of someone as a moral arbiter, or to speak of some group as functioning in that role, is to say that there is arbitration and that it concerns moral matters.
Publication details
Published in:
Bondeson William B., Engelhardt Tristram, Spicker Stuart, White Jr Joseph M (1982) New knowledge in the biomedical sciences: some moral implications of its acquisition, possession, and use. Dordrecht, Springer.
Seiten: 23-31
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-7723-5_2
Referenz:
Gorovitz Samuel (1982) „The physician as moral arbiter“, In: W. B. Bondeson, T. Engelhardt, Spicker & J.M. White Jr (eds.), New knowledge in the biomedical sciences, Dordrecht, Springer, 23–31.