Rohlf reviews and assesses Allen Wood's criticisms of John Rawls's Kantian constructivism as a way of presenting and commenting on some core issues in contemporary Kantian moral philosophy. He argues that the most promising approach to Kantian moral philosophy incorporates elements of both Rawls's and Wood's accounts, specifically Rawls's constructivist view of moral judgment and Wood's metaethical realist interpretation, but in the context of a conception of ethical theory that lies somewhere between Rawls's and Wood's.