This chapter continues the response to the dilemma previously discussed. If we define what it is for a subject to remember in a way that allows that they could be distinct from the subject whose experiences or deeds are being remembered, it seems that memory cannot constitute a sufficient condition for personal identity. But if we define what it is for a subject to remember in a way that rules out that possibility, it then seems that our definition must rest on a prior understanding of personal identity, and so the proposed account becomes circular.