Repository | Zeitschrift | Band | Artikel
Replies
pp. 285-296
Abstrakt
I reply to challenges raised by contributors to this book symposium. Key challenges include (but are not limited to): distancing my new account of reductionism-in-practice from my previous "new wave" account; clarifying my claimed "heuristic" status for higher-level investigations (including cognitive-neuroscientific ones); defending the "reorientation of philosophical desires" I claim to be required by my project; and addressing consideration about normativity.
Publication details
Published in:
(2005) Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3).
Seiten: 285-296
DOI: 10.1007/s11097-005-4074-2
Referenz:
Bickle John (2005) „Replies“. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3), 285–296.